Cookies help us display personalized product recommendations and ensure you have great shopping experience.

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
  • Analytics
    AnalyticsShow More
    composable analytics
    How Composable Analytics Unlocks Modular Agility for Data Teams
    9 Min Read
    data mining to find the right poly bag makers
    Using Data Analytics to Choose the Best Poly Mailer Bags
    12 Min Read
    data analytics for pharmacy trends
    How Data Analytics Is Tracking Trends in the Pharmacy Industry
    5 Min Read
    car expense data analytics
    Data Analytics for Smarter Vehicle Expense Management
    10 Min Read
    image fx (60)
    Data Analytics Driving the Modern E-commerce Warehouse
    13 Min Read
  • Big Data
  • BI
  • Exclusive
  • IT
  • Marketing
  • Software
Search
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Share
Notification
Font ResizerAa
SmartData CollectiveSmartData Collective
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • About
  • Help
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-23 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
SmartData Collective > Big Data > Data Visualization > Because it’s Friday: The dating equation
Data Visualization

Because it’s Friday: The dating equation

DavidMSmith
DavidMSmith
4 Min Read
SHARE

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

More Read

Can Fossil Analysis Software Help Us Plan Curriculum?
Data Visualization in 4D: Sculpture and a Musical Score
Get to the point
Visualization the Key to Grown Up Business Intelligence
Exploring Visual Similarity with Modista

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower …

According to internet lore, there’s a mathematical equation that governs the lower bound for the socially acceptable age of a potential dating partner: half your age plus 7, or, in mathematical terms, if x is your age then the lower bound is f(x) = x/2 + 7.

Seems simple, right? if you’re 20, then the minimum socially acceptable age for a date is 17. But it was The Ragbag who pointed out that this rule has a duality: for the date to be socially acceptable, the rule must be adhered to by your date as well. In other words, there’s a socially acceptable maximum too, given by inverting the equation:

It was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). For the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

The Ragbag handily plotted out the socially acceptable upper and lower bounds for dates at various ages in the chart below:

Halfageplus7rule

Notably, the chart also implies that there is a socially acceptable lower bound for your own age: below the age of 14, by this rule, you shouldn’t be dating at all.

Incidentally, if you’re wondering how well is this rule adhered to in practice, the dating website okcupid.com has done an extensive analysis of age preferences amongst their members. A really interesting analysis (and quite sophisticated – maybe done in R?), especially for heterosexual males looking for the ideal age-ranges for potential dates. 

The Ragbag: The half your age plus 7 rule

Link to original post

TAGGED:data visualizationr
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn
Share

Follow us on Facebook

Latest News

composable analytics
How Composable Analytics Unlocks Modular Agility for Data Teams
Analytics Big Data Exclusive
fintech startups
Why Fintech Start-Ups Struggle To Secure The Funding They Need
Infographic News
edge networks in manufacturing
Edge Infrastructure Strategies for Data-Driven Manufacturers
Big Data Exclusive
data mining to find the right poly bag makers
Using Data Analytics to Choose the Best Poly Mailer Bags
Analytics Big Data Exclusive

Stay Connected

1.2kFollowersLike
33.7kFollowersFollow
222FollowersPin

You Might also Like

3 Powerful Data Presentations That Inspired Genuine Change

5 Min Read

Data Visualization: Why (1 of 2)

8 Min Read
data visualization trends 2022
Data Visualization

Biggest Trends in Data Visualization Taking Shape in 2022

8 Min Read

Package Update Roundup: Apr 2009

5 Min Read

SmartData Collective is one of the largest & trusted community covering technical content about Big Data, BI, Cloud, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, IoT & more.

AI and chatbots
Chatbots and SEO: How Can Chatbots Improve Your SEO Ranking?
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Exclusive
ai is improving the safety of cars
From Bolts to Bots: How AI Is Fortifying the Automotive Industry
Artificial Intelligence

Quick Link

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Follow US
© 2008-25 SmartData Collective. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?